Contrary to popular belief, the above-mentioned phrase is decidedly not a compliment, regardless of the intentions of the speaker. These words can be said in English, in German, or with any variety of well-meaning tones of voice. The phrase remains the worst sort of backhanded compliment: an unintentional one.
The unsaid statement behind the phrase is, “I’m surprised you can speak a foreign language well, because most Americans can’t.” My immediate reaction is to refute such a claim: What the hell does my Passport have to do with my knowledge of French? Since when does citizenship determine foreign language proficiency? Unfortunately, when my righteous anger died down, I came to a terrible realization. They might be right.
My Massachusetts public education first exposed me to foreign languages in the 7th Grade, when I was 13 years old. We had a trimester of French, Spanish, and German, giving each of us a taste of the language so we could better decide which introductory language course to take in the 8th Grade. In most European countries, students start learning a foreign language when they are eight years old. For most U.S. eight-year-olds, learning a foreign language is not even an option. Only 24% of public elementary schools in the United States offer foreign language courses, according to the Center for Applied Linguistics. Among those schools that do offer foreign language instruction, 79% focus on introductory exposure rather than overall proficiency.
As someone who values foreign language education, I have a huge problem with these figures. But am I just biased on the issue? Europeans come into contact with foreign languages much more often than U.S. citizens, simply by living in a part of the world where so many countries with different cultures, languages, and dialects of language coexist. Of course someone from Luxembourg is going to need to speak multiple languages; Luxembourg has three official languages and borders Belgium, France, and Germany. And isn’t English a so-called “world language” anyway? To achieve international success in either business or science, a strong grasp of the English language is crucial. At least, that’s what my U.S. upbringing has led me to believe.
I cannot disprove the usefulness of English as a first language; on the contrary, I can only confirm from various traveling experiences that my knowledge of the English language allowed me to communicate when I otherwise could not. And yes, from my hometown in Massachusetts the nearest non-English speaking country is Canada, in the Quebec province, and that’s quite a trip. So why should U.S. citizens bother to learn a foreign language when “everybody speaks English anyway,” when opportunities to use foreign language skills are few and far between?
Studies have shown that learning a second language benefits students in other academic subjects. Students in the U.S. who study a foreign language statistically perform better on standardized tests than those who do not in core areas such as math, reading, and English language literacy. Even problem solving skills are positively affected. If enhanced academic performance is not reason enough, let’s look at the “global dominance” of the English language. In terms of global population, the percentage of native English speakers is on the decline. With a worldwide decrease in native English speakers, it is only natural that other languages, like Mandarin Chinese, will grow in proportion to their native-speaking populations. While I’m not suggesting we all begin learning Mandarin, I am suggesting that the U.S. needs to re-assess its values in education. We cannot simply assume English is the “world language,” or that English will indefinitely remain vital in global discourse.
Personally, learning the French language has shaped and enriched the person I am today. Since moving to Paris, France I have met so many wonderful, patient people not only willing, but excited to help me learn French. Even after all the embarrassing mistakes, misunderstandings, and unintentional backhanded compliments, at the end of each day I’ve learned something, and it’s not always language-related. Learning a foreign language has been one of the most rewarding experiences of my life, a learning experience from which all people, regardless of citizenship, can benefit.
Any comments regarding the article can be posted below – no subscription required! I modified the words to say “French” instead of “German”, just because this is a French related site. You can find the original post HERE.
Yes, in Vancouver, I was placed in a French immersion-which felt like the norm- enabling me now to speak multiple languages (French, Spanish, English, etc.) It is so useful, especially as I now live in Europe, where I travel frequently.
I agree, it is essential to learn english nowadays. With my husband we are now able to watch tv series without subtitles in both american and brittish english (brit is still difficult).
WIth English you can go practically anywhere in the world. It’s like latin before.
It opens all whole world. Internet for example, I would miss so many things if I didn’t know English.
WHen we watch japanese anime in Japanese it is usually subtitled in English.
Of course the more languages you learn the more access to things you will have.
My husband and I are currently learning japanese, and I’m longing for the day when I’ll be able to watch anime with no subtitles and also go to japanes web pages. BUt it’s a little bit longer to learn than English. haha
English is one of the most important languages in the world. It can even be said to be the single most important language.Other languages are important too
know about TOEFL
Interesting! I had no idea that Americans start foreign language studies in grade 7. I’m Canadian, and in my school they began teaching french in grade 4 (I was 9 years old).
here in Toronto, it is not terribly common, but it is not difficult to put a child into french “immersion” in grade 3 (7 years old?) … (supposedly) meaning that the only english spoken is between teachers and parents! And there are two other levels of instruction: “regular” (which starts in grade 3 or 4) and “extended” which is somewhere between “regular” and “immersion”. That is, in “extended” french, about half the subjects (history? geograph?) are conducted in french and the other half (Math and Science, among them) remain in English.
One of the reasons that the “extended” and “immersion” programs are popular really isn’t about french or language instructions at all… rather, the attraction is that it’s a program that students (and parents) have to choose. That means that your classmates are present because they WANT to be present — without exception. In the “normal” school programming, students (and parents) often are present by default. Another way to put it is in that the speical programs have an “exclusive” air about them — kind of like a private schoo. Taht’s not a bad thing. It contributes to the popularity and success of the program (“grass is always greener…”) The point? The point is that in order to promote special language instruction programs, it’s all well and good to tout the benefits of learning a second language… but an effective way to promote the program is to appeal to parents’ desire for that je ne sais quoi that is so often associated with exclusivity. ‘Sounds bad, I know… but it’s practical and effective!! :)
Many Americans do not start studying a language until the 9th grade (or even later). It depends on the school/district.